Latest editorials All articles


Articles found: 47 of 47
Bachmaier_Lorena 2018-2_bw.jpg Prof. Dr. Lorena Bachmaier

Fundamental Rights and Effectiveness in the European AFSJ
The Continuous and Never Easy Challenge of Striking the Right Balance

1 June 2018 (updated 4 weeks ago) // english

In the context of the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ), “the need to strike the right balance” between the effectiveness of criminal prosecution and cooperation in criminal matters, and the protection of fundamental rights, but also between the primacy of EU law and national constitutions, is a core goal. By addressing two precise scenarios, this article attempts to show how the “needed balances” are understood. This analysis will further serve to show whether the EU is moving in the right direction in the field of cooperation matters. The first scenario will focus on the protection of fundamental rights in cross-border investigations within the context of EPPO proceedings under Regulation (EU) 2017/1939. Secondly, a number of aspects regarding the European Arrest Warrant are analysed. The author argues that, even if the AFSJ is advancing in quite a measured way, much can still be done to improve the ... Read more

Editorial Guest Editorial eucrim 1/2018

1 June 2018 (updated 2 months ago) // english

Dear Readers, Since the launch of the project to establish a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, concerns have continuously been voiced over the standard of protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. The criticism is directed at the European Union firmly moving towards a more efficient prosecution, but disregarding the need for strengthening the protection of fundamental rights in transnational criminal proceedings. It has been constant during the past decades, gaining momentum after implementation of the 2002 Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (FD EAW). The Commission could no longer ignore the critical voices being raised by academics, human rights... Read more

Bovend'Eerdt.jpg Koen Bovend’Eerdt LL.M.

The Commission Proposal Amending the OLAF Regulation

1 June 2018 (updated 2 months ago) // english

On 23 May 2018, the Commission published its Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 883/2013 and the accompanying Staff Working Document. This brief article sets out (I) the main outcomes of the evaluation of Regulation 883/2013 completed in late 2017, (II) the objectives and scope of the Commission proposal, and (III) the main proposed changes and their rationale.

Read more
Prof. Sabino Cassese

Il coraggio che serve all’Europa – The Courage that Europe Needs

17 April 2018 (updated 2 months ago) // english

Free translation from Italian into English by Francesco de Angelis and Indira Tie from an article written by Professor Sabino Cassese
With its recent decision of 20 December 2017, the European Union – the most ingenious political construction of the 20th century – reminded Poland that common values have to be respected. Since it is the first time in the history of the Union that this has ever happened, this event deserves reflection.

Read more
Maesa_bw.jpg Costanza Di Francesco Maesa

Repercussions of the Establishment of the EPPO via Enhanced Cooperation
EPPO's Added Value and the Possibility to Extend its Competence

18 January 2018 (updated 3 weeks, 1 day ago) // english

This article addresses several issues on the added value of the recently established European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO). One section of the article explores whether the establishment of the EPPO via enhanced cooperation undermines the added value of the EPPO in combating crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union. Another section offers an evaluation of whether the establishment of the EPPO via enhanced cooperation makes it more difficult or even impossible to further extend the competence of the EPPO over terrorism-related crimes.

Read more
Giuffrida_Fabio_SW.jpg Fabio Giuffrida

Cross-Border Crimes and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office

17 January 2018 (updated 3 weeks, 1 day ago) // english

This contribution aims to shed light on some issues concerning the cross-border cases (already or potentially) falling within the competence of the EPPO. The notion of “cross-border cases” – them being PIF offences or other offences – encompasses at least three scenarios:
i) Cases involving two or more Member States participating in the EPPO, including cases where the criminal activity is carried out in a single country, but the suspect has a habitual residence in, or is a national of, another Member State;
ii) Cases involving two or more Member States, one of which is not part of enhanced cooperation;
iii) Cases involving at least one third country.
In the scenarios under ii) and iii), the controversial topic is how to regulate the relations of the EPPO with the competent authorities of non-participating Member States or third countries. In contrast, the scenario under i) brings to the fore issues concerning the efficient handling ... Read more