ECA Gives its Opinion on Recast of Financial Regulation
15 November 2022
2018-Max_Planck_Herr_Wahl_1355_black white_Zuschnitt.jpg Thomas Wahl

On 31 October 2022, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) published its opinion on the Commission proposal for a recast of the EU’s Financial Regulation (→ eucrim 2/2022, 105). The opinion follows up an ECA opinion on the Commission’s proposal of July 2022 and ECA’s recent report on blacklisting (→ eucrim 2/2022, 105-106).

The proposed recast aims, inter alia, to make the EU’s basic rules governing the establishment, implementation and control of the EU budget better aligned with the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) package, to introduce improvements and simplifications to better respond to crises, and to improve the protection of the EU’s financial interests.

In its opinion, the ECA welcomed several of the proposed amendments, such as the further digitalisation in the fight against fraud and the Early Detection and Exclusion System being operated under shared management with Member States. The auditors called to mind, however, that the scope for excluding untrustworthy counterparties will remain greater in direct management.

They also welcomed that programmes and activities will be implemented without compromising the climate and sustainability goals, as recommended in a previous Special Report.

However, the ECA also raises several critical points of the Commission's proposal. For example, the proposed recast of the EU’s Financial Regulation does not address the insufficient reporting on the Commission's debt management, which is particularly relevant since there is currently no coherent framework on the achievements of the dept management in relation to the NextGenerationEU and other borrowing programmes.

The ECA also calls for more transparency and accountability in connection with financial instruments and budgetary guarantee. Lastly, the proposals to shorten the time frame for ECA’s audit activities on annual accounts should not be pursued at this stage, as the quality and rigour of statements of assurance could suffer as a result.

News Guide

EU Protection of Financial Interests


2018-Max_Planck_Herr_Wahl_1355_black white_Zuschnitt.jpg
Thomas Wahl

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI CSL)

Public Law Department

Senior Researcher