Council Conclusions on PNR Transfers to Third Countries
6 July 2021
2018-Max_Planck_Herr_Wahl_1355_black white_Zuschnitt.jpg Thomas Wahl

At its meeting on 7-8 June 2021, the JHA Council adopted conclusions on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data to third countries, in particular Australia and the United States, for the purpose of combatting terrorism and serious crime. The Council emphasised that joint evaluations demonstrated the added value and operational effectiveness of the Agreements between the EU and both Australia and the United States with regard to the processing and transfer of PNR data by air carriers to the Australian and US law enforcement authorities. It also underlined that the agreements’ objectives are in line with international obligations to collect, process and exchange PNR data, e.g. UN Security Council resolutions and the recent amendment to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (“Chicago Convention”). The Council, however, acknowledges that the agreements with Australia and US do not fully comply with the CJEU’s Opinion 1/15 that toppled the envisaged EU-Canada PNR deal because it was not in line with the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and Union data protection law (→ eucrim 3/2017, 114-115).

The conclusions reiterate that adequate retention is key and call on the Commission “to pursue a consistent and effective approach regarding the transfer of PNR data to third countries for the purpose of combating terrorism and serious crime, building on the ICAO SARPs [Standards and Recommended Practices on PNR of the International Civil Aviation Organization], and in line with the relevant requirements established under Union law.”

News Guide

EU Data Protection


2018-Max_Planck_Herr_Wahl_1355_black white_Zuschnitt.jpg
Thomas Wahl

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (MPI CSL)

Public Law Department

Senior Researcher