C-328/24 - eucrim

Case C-328/24 P

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-328/24 P Party Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office Type of proceeding Appeal	Interpretation of Art. 42(1) of Regulation 2017/1939 – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by national courts – Plea of illegality - Exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU to review the legality of EU acts – Art. 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Art. 263 TFEU – Possible infringement of Art. 47 CFR – Right to effective judicial protection Case before the General Court: T-385/23. Categories Fundamental Rights European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) Procedural Safeguards Related links Summary of the judgment in eucrim: CJEU Confirms National Courts’ Role in Reviewing EPPO Measures ^News	Appeal Judgment

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-328/24 P

Party: Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Type of proceeding: Appeal

Interpretation of Art. 42(1) of Regulation 2017/1939 – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by national courts – Plea of illegality - Exclusive jurisdiction of the CJEU to review the legality of EU acts – Art. 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Art. 263 TFEU – Possible infringement of Art. 47 CFR – Right to effective judicial protection

Case before the General Court: T-385/23.

Case C-328/24 P

Categories

Related links