References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/6/EC — Insider dealing — Penalties — National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts — Res judicata attached to a final criminal judgment relating to administrative proceedings — Final criminal judgment ordering acquittal in respect of insider dealing — Effectiveness of the penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Criminal nature of the administrative sanction — Existence of the same offence — Article 52(1) — Limitations to the ne bis in idem principle — Conditions

Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Declaration by a Member State allowing it to continue to apply earlier legal instruments — Withdrawal of the declaration by the executing State — Late declaration by the issuing State — Lack of direct effect of framework decisions — Primacy of EU law —

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Grounds for optional non-execution — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person sentenced to a custodial sentence in final proceedings conducted in his presence — Execution of sentence subsequently suspended in part subject to certain conditions — Subsequent proceedings leading to revocation of the suspension due to non-compliance with those conditions — Revocation proceedings conducted in the absence of the person concerned

Individual complaint to the General Court - Appeal — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of non-privileged applicants in direct actions — Concept of a lawyer — Autonomous concept of EU law — Opportunity to remedy a defect in legal representation

Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant — Offence underlying the imposition of a custodial sentence in the issuing Member State being punishable in the executing Member State by fine only

See also:

CJEU: Surrender of Resident if Executing State Unable to Enforce Custodial Sentence

Access to information of the detainee - Pre-trial detention - term of imprinsonment

Non-contractual liability — Investigation by OLAF — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Non-material damage — Causal link

Appeal is referred to as C-615/19 P.

Obligation of the Member States to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Flat-rate fine — Principle of proportionality — (No) direct applicability of the directive

The case is related to Case C-205/20 (ECJ, Grand Chamber judgment), in which the ECJ changed its approach on the direct applicability of obligations to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties

Definition of "the trial" in Article 4a of the Framework Decision - Extradition

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2014/41/EU — European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters — Article 5(1) — Form set out in Annex A — Section J — Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Surrender procedures between Member States - Conditions for execution - Grounds for optional non-execution - Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order - ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ - Legal proceedings amending or combining a sentence passed previously - Decision handing down a cumulative sentence - Decision handed down without the person concerned having appeared in person - Person convicted not having appeared in person at the trial in the context of his initial conviction, either at first instance or on appeal - Person represented by a legal counsellor in the appeal proceedings - Arrest warrant not providing any information in that regard - Consequences for the executing judicial authority

European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Reasons for optional non-execution — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person concerned having appeared in person at first instance — Appeal proceedings involving a re-examination of the substance of the case — Arrest warrant providing no information making it possible to check whether the rights of the defence of the person convicted were upheld during the appeal proceedings

Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Grounds for the refusal to execute — Closure of a criminal investigation — Principle ne bis in idem — Requested person who had the status of a witness in previous proceedings concerning the same acts — Issue of several European arrest warrants against the same person

European Union Citizenship — Request to a Member State by a third country seeking extradition of an EU citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first Member State — Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence and not for the purpose of prosecution — Prohibition on extradition applied only to own nationals — Restriction on free movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality

Principles of EU law — Sincere cooperation — Procedural autonomy — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — National legislation laying down a remedy allowing criminal proceedings to be reheard in the event of infringement of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — No obligation to extend that procedure to cases of alleged infringement of the fundamental rights enshrined in EU law

Market manipulation — Penalties — National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Ne bis in idem principle — Criminal nature of the administrative penalties — Existence of the same offence