This article examines the ongoing reform of the European Union’s anti-corruption mechanism against the backdrop of a large and vulnerable EU budget and persistent shortcomings in protecting the Union’s financial interests. It identifies two core weaknesses of the current framework centred on OLAF: the lack of effective criminal follow-up by national prosecuting authorities and recurrent concerns over the compatibility of OLAF’s investigative practices with fundamental procedural rights. The article analyses the Commission’s post-Lisbon reform initiatives, including proposals to strengthen OLAF’s investigative efficiency and accountability, improve cooperation with national authorities, Eurojust and Europol, and develop a more integrated administrative–criminal law approach. Particular attention is paid to the envisaged establishment of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) under Art. 86 TFEU as a potential game-changer for prosecutions of offences affecting the EU’s financial interests. The contribution argues that, if properly implemented, the combined package of enhanced OLAF supervision, better coordination, and a … Read more

This article examines how Council of Europe (CoE) member states address the manipulation of sports results, notably match-fixing, through their criminal law systems and what role future international instruments should play. Building on CoE Recommendation CM/Rec(2011)10 on the promotion of integrity in sport, it maps existing national approaches, showing that some states have introduced specific offences targeting manipulation of sports results, while others rely on general provisions on fraud, corruption, money laundering, or illegal gambling. The contribution highlights that, in practice, authorities largely consider existing criminal law frameworks sufficient, even though investigations and prosecutions remain uneven across Europe and complicated by the transnational nature of match-fixing and related betting schemes. It also explores jurisdictional issues and potential conflicts of jurisdiction in multi-country cases. Against this background, the article argues that any future CoE convention on match-fixing should prioritise coordinated preventive, regulatory, and cooperative measures rather than detailed harmonisation of criminal … Read more

This article examines the European Union’s role and obligations under the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), to which the EU acceded in 2008 as the only regional economic integration organisation. It first outlines the scope and structure of UNCAC and its implementation architecture, including the Conference of the States Parties and the peer-review Implementation Review Mechanism. The article then analyses the specific legal position of the EU: its declaration of competences (pre- and post-Lisbon), the partial and evolving nature of its UNCAC obligations, and the practical consequences for representation and voting. Particular attention is paid to the EU’s failure so far to join the UNCAC review mechanism, despite being a State Party, and to the legal, institutional, and political challenges this raises – notably the need to update the EU’s declaration of competence, to define which provisions and institutions should be reviewed, and to arrange an appropriate review set-up. … Read more

This article analyses the criminal offence of unjustified set-off in Italian tax law, introduced alongside the offence of non-payment of VAT by Legislative Decree No. 74/2000 (Sects. 10-ter and 10-quater) to counter increasingly common forms of tax evasion. It explains set-off as a legal mechanism (vertical vs. horizontal set-off under Sect. 17 of Legislative Decree No. 241/1997) and shows how the abuse of horizontal set-off through non-existent or non-applicable tax credits enables concealed non-payment of taxes, including in VAT carousel fraud schemes. The contribution examines the constitutive elements of the offence: the use of fictitious or ineligible credits via Form F24, failure to pay amounts exceeding €50,000 per tax period, the required mens rea (including contingent intent), the temporal moment of commission, and the position of intermediaries. It further outlines the parallel administrative offence regime, the speciality principle governing the interaction between criminal and administrative sanctions, and the mitigating effects … Read more

This article analyses the complex relationship between administrative and criminal sanctions in Polish law, focusing on tax and social security cases and the constitutional ne bis in idem principle. It centres on the 2011 judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (P 90/08), which held that the 75% lump-sum tax on undisclosed income under the Personal Income Tax Act is a “special type of tax” rather than a criminal sanction, and thus its cumulative application alongside fiscal-criminal liability under the tax penal code does not violate ne bis in idem. The article reconstructs the Tribunal’s reasoning on the preventive and compensatory nature of such tax measures, contrasts it with dissenting views emphasising excessive repressiveness, and situates the ruling within earlier Constitutional Tribunal case law on VAT “additional tax obligations” and other double-sanction scenarios. It further explores the emergence of an “administrative-criminal law” sphere in which economic sanctions imposed by administrative authorities … Read more

By law of 27 March 2003, the Central Office for Seizure and Confiscation (COSC) was created in Belgium. The new institution, established within the Office of Public Prosecutors, assists the judicial authorities in criminal matters in the areas of seizure of assets, the implementation of criminal procedure with a view to the confiscation of assets, and the enforcement of final and conclusive sentences and orders involving confiscation of assets.1 One of the forms of assistance consists of the management of all cash, seized in criminal matters all over the country. By law of 20 July 2005, a new provision was… Read more