Search results

Showing recent content — use the filters to narrow down results.


Profile
Weyembergh, Anne
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Article
Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2013
Dear Readers, EU money must not be pocketed by criminals. We have a federal budget – with money coming from the 28 EU Member States – and, as a consequence, we also need federal laws to protect this budget. This is why the European Commission proposed a Directive on the protection of the EU’s financial interests in July 2012. The new EU-wide rules aim to achieve two objectives: First, to introduce common definitions of fraud throughout the EU, making sure that fraud against the EU budget is considered a crime everywhere in the EU. Second, to set a minimum level…
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Profile
Šemeta, Algirdas
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Profile
Vivane, Reding
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Article
All Roads Lead to Rome: The New AFSJ Package and the Trajectory to Europe 2020

The article reflects on the trajectory of EU criminal law and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) after the Lisbon Treaty and the Stockholm Programme, in view of the upcoming “Rome Programme” (2015–2020). Herlin-Karnell identifies eight key points for the future: strengthening the …

Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Profile
Herlin-Karnell, Ester
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Article
EU’s Criminal Policy and the Possible Contents of a New Multi-Annual Programme
The steps forward of the European Communities or of the European Union have always been quite associated with the names of the cities where the crucial decisions − very often long prepared in advance in Brussels, Strasbourg or elsewhere − were presumed having been finally taken: Rome, Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice, Lisbon… The same is true of the turning points in the field of Justice and Home Affairs after the entry into force, in November 1993, of the Treaty establishing the European Union (the Maastricht Treaty). Immediately after the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty, on 1st of May 1999,…
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Article
Where Should the European Union Go in Developing Its Criminal Policy in the Future?

The article reflects on the post-Lisbon framework for EU criminal policy. While the Treaties introduced QMV and co-decision, they also restricted competences to certain procedural and substantive aspects under the principle of conferral. Nilsson warns against legislative lethargy under the “Festina Lente” approach and calls …

Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Article
Guest Editorial eucrim 1/2014
Dear Readers, When the Union prepares itself to negotiate and adopt new strategic guidelines on the basis of Art. 68 TFEU, probably already in June 2014, it could be useful to consider what the Union should do for the development of its criminal policy (provided it could be said the Union has one). Looking back on the development of the EU criminal law since the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam on 1 May 1999, some useful conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, the EU criminal law is a very recent phenomenon in the development of EU law in…
Published 6 years, 11 months ago
Profile
Nilsson, Hans G.
Published 6 years, 11 months ago