C-520/20 - eucrim

Case C-520/20

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-520/20 Party DB, LY Type of proceeding Reference for a preliminary ruling Referring court Administrativen sad Silistra, Bulgaria	Question referred: Must Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), and in particular Article 39(3) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that it allows national rules and administrative practices under which, if the competent executing authority has valid reason to conclude that the alert entered in the SIS is not covered by the objectives for which it has been registered, and in particular the objectives laid down in Article 38(1), that authority can and must refuse to execute it? Categories Schengen Judicial Cooperation Data Protection	Request Opinion (AG) Judgment

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-520/20

Party: DB, LY
Type of proceeding: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Referring court: Administrativen sad Silistra, Bulgaria

Question referred: Must Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), and in particular Article 39(3) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that it allows national rules and administrative practices under which, if the competent executing authority has valid reason to conclude that the alert entered in the SIS is not covered by the objectives for which it has been registered, and in particular the objectives laid down in Article 38(1), that authority can and must refuse to execute it?

Case C-520/20

Categories