Case C-333/22

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-333/22 Party Ligue des droits humains ASBL, BA v. L’organe de contrôle de l’information policière Type of proceeding Reference for a preliminary ruling Referring court Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium)	Questions referred: Do Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union require provision to be made for a judicial remedy against an independent supervisory authority such as the Supervisory Body for Police Information where it exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller? Does Article 17 of Directive 2016/680 (1) comply with Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, in that it obliges the supervisory authority — which exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller — only to inform the data subject ‘that all necessary verifications or a review by the supervisory authority have taken place’ and ‘of his or her right to seek a judicial remedy’, when such information does not enable any a posteriori review to be conducted as regards the action taken and assessment made by the supervisory authority in the light of the data of the data subject and the obligations of the controller? Categories Data Protection Related links AG: Belgian Law Must Provide Right to an Effective Judicial Remedy against Supervisory Authority ^News ECJ: Belgium Must Improve the Law on the Indirect Exercise of Data Subjects’ Rights under LED ^News	Request Opinion (AG) Judgment

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-333/22

Party: Ligue des droits humains ASBL, BA v. L’organe de contrôle de l’information policière
Type of proceeding: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Referring court: Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium)

Questions referred: Do Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union require provision to be made for a judicial remedy against an independent supervisory authority such as the Supervisory Body for Police Information where it exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller?

Does Article 17 of Directive 2016/680 (1) comply with Articles 47 and 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, in that it obliges the supervisory authority — which exercises the rights of the data subject vis-à-vis the controller — only to inform the data subject ‘that all necessary verifications or a review by the supervisory authority have taken place’ and ‘of his or her right to seek a judicial remedy’, when such information does not enable any a posteriori review to be conducted as regards the action taken and assessment made by the supervisory authority in the light of the data of the data subject and the obligations of the controller?

Case C-333/22

Categories

Related links