Case C-16/22 - eucrim

Case C-016/22

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-016/22 Party Staatsanwaltschaft Graz v MS Type of proceeding Reference for a preliminary ruling Referring court Oberlandesgericht Graz (Austria)	Question referred: Must the first sentence of Article 1(1) and Article 2(c)(i) of Directive 2014/41/EU regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters be interpreted as meaning that a German tax office for criminal tax matters and tax investigation which is empowered under national rules to exercise the rights and fulfil the obligations of the public prosecutor’s office in relation to certain offences is to be regarded as a ‘judicial authority’ and an ‘issuing authority’ within the meaning of those provisions of EU law? Categories European Investigation Order Related links See also the question referred to in Case C-66/20 ^{Procedure page} ECJ: EIOs by Tax Authorities Need Validation	Request Judgment

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-016/22

Party: Staatsanwaltschaft Graz v MS
Type of proceeding: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Referring court: Oberlandesgericht Graz (Austria)

Question referred: Must the first sentence of Article 1(1) and Article 2(c)(i) of Directive 2014/41/EU regarding the
European Investigation Order in criminal matters be interpreted as meaning that a German tax office for criminal tax matters and tax investigation which is empowered under national rules to exercise the rights and fulfil the obligations of the public prosecutor’s office in relation to certain offences is to be regarded as a ‘judicial authority’ and an ‘issuing authority’ within the meaning of those provisions of EU law?

Case C-016/22

Categories

Related links