C-792/22 - eucrim

Case C-792/22

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-792/22 Party Energotehnica (Criminal proceedings against MG) Type of proceeding Reference for a preliminary ruling Referring court Curtea de Apel Braşov (Court of Appeal of Brașov (Romania))	Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – General obligations relating to the protection of safety and health – Parallel national proceedings – Judgment of an administrative court having force of res judicata before the criminal court – Classification of an event as an "accident at work" – Effectiveness of the protection of the rights guaranteed by Directive 89/391 – Art. 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Disciplinary proceedings against a judge of an ordinary court in the event of failure to comply with a decision of a constitutional court that is contrary to EU law – Primacy of EU law. Categories Fundamental Rights Rule of Law Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Procedural Safeguards Victim Protection Related links Summary of the judgment in eucrim: ECJ Ruled on Res Judicata Effects of Administrative Court Decision before Criminal Courts ^News	Request Opinion (AG) View Judgment Order Opinion (Court) Ruling Decision

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-792/22

Party: Energotehnica (Criminal proceedings against MG)
Type of proceeding: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Referring court: Curtea de Apel Braşov (Court of Appeal of Brașov (Romania))

Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – General obligations relating to the protection of safety and health – Parallel national proceedings – Judgment of an administrative court having force of res judicata before the criminal court – Classification of an event as an "accident at work" – Effectiveness of the protection of the rights guaranteed by Directive 89/391 – Art. 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Disciplinary proceedings against a judge of an ordinary court in the event of failure to comply with a decision of a constitutional court that is contrary to EU law – Primacy of EU law.

Case C-792/22

Categories

Related links