C-712/25 - eucrim

Case C-712/25 PPU

Case Information	Subject Matter	Stage of Proceedings
C-712/25 PPU Party Rastoshev Type of proceeding Reference for a preliminary ruling Referring court Apelativen sad – Sofia (Court of Appeal, Sofia, Bulgaria)	Question referred: Does a line of case law in the executing Member State comply with Art. 4(7)(a) of Framework Decision 2002/584 to the effect that the fact that the offence, for which an EAW was issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution, was committed, in whole or in part, on the territory of the executing Member State is sufficient to refuse to execute that warrant? Categories Area of Freedom, Security and Justice European Arrest Warrant Related links Summary of the judgment in eucrim: Execution of EAW if Offence Was Committed Also in the Territory of Executing State ^News	Request Opinion (AG) Judgment

Case Information

Subject Matter

Stage of Proceedings

C-712/25 PPU

Party: Rastoshev
Type of proceeding: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Referring court: Apelativen sad – Sofia (Court of Appeal, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Question referred:

Does a line of case law in the executing Member State comply with Art. 4(7)(a) of Framework Decision 2002/584 to the effect that the fact that the offence, for which an EAW was issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution, was committed, in whole or in part, on the territory of the executing Member State is sufficient to refuse to execute that warrant?

Case C-712/25 PPU

Categories

Related links