Article 1(12) of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - obligation to state reasons - Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - right to be ‘advised’ by a lawyer

Article 1(12) of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - infringement of the fundamental rights to protection of privacy and access to justice - breach of the principle of proportionality - not suitable for achieving the legitimate objectives - breach of the principle of legal certainty

EU Staff Regulation - Duties of EU institutions to protect informants - Necessary protection beyond the discharge of the informant's duties - Parliamentary Assistants - renewal of contract - collaboration with OLAF - retaliation of whistleblowers - non-material damage and compensation

Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – General obligations relating to the protection of safety and health – Parallel national proceedings – Judgment of an administrative court having force of res judicata before the criminal court – Classification of an event as an "accident at work" – Effectiveness of the protection of the rights guaranteed by Directive 89/391 – Art. 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Disciplinary proceedings against a judge of an ordinary court in the event of failure to comply with a decision of a constitutional court that is contrary to EU law – Primacy of EU law.

Commission's infringement action against the Hungarian Law LXXIX of 2021 adopting stricter measures against persons convicted of paedophilia and amending certain laws for the protection of children - Commission's application to declare the Hungarian law incompatible with EU law in several areas, including media freedom, advertising, electronic commerce and education - infringement of principles of EU law and fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU

Scope of Framework Decision 2005/212 and Directive 2014/42 - freezing/confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the EU - Latvian legislation providing for the possibility, in the course of criminal proceedings, of initiating proceedings for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a conviction and where there is no reason relating to the illness or absconding of the accused person

Note: The case was joined with Cases C-43/23 and C-161/23

Does Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States 1 preclude the legislation of a Member State from granting a governmental authority the power to decide, between a European arrest warrant and a concurrent extradition request issued by a third country, which of the two is to be executed, without any possibility of legal remedy?

Right of a defendant to be present at his or her trial - Article 8(1) of Directive 2016/343 - video conference - effective and confidential means of conferring with his or her lawyer

Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – no Automatic Mutual Recognition of Refugee Status – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State

The applicant successfully seeked the annulment of Council restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council brought an appeal against the judgment of the General Court on 5 September 2024 in C-584/24 P.

Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Concept of ‘leading businessperson’

Investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Article 9(4) of Regulation 883/2013, as amended by Regulation 2020/2223 - Not providing suspects with reasonably detailed and clear fact statements and an additional opportunity to comment on such statements

Reference for preliminary ruling in EncroChat case - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Interpretation of Directive 2014/41/EU on the European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Concept of "issuing authority" – Spying on and transmitting traffic, location, and communication data of an internet-based communications service provider from France to Germany – Mobile phones equipped with encryption software – Illicit trafficking in substantial quantities of narcotic drugs – Use of evidence in criminal proceedings

The applicants seek the annulment of Article 1, point 4, of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1273 of 21 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

Common foreign and security policy – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern

The applicants seek the annulment of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1273 of 21 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. They claimed that such measures should be within the powers of EU Member States, not the EU Council. Specifically, they contended that the obligations amounted to a misuse of power and should not be regarded as necessary for implementing decisions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

Common foreign and security policy – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern

The Court of Justice is asked to clarify if Council Directive 2018/822 as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation infringes Article 6(3) of the Treaty of the European Union and Articles 20 and 21 ECHR by not limiting the reporting obligation in respect of cross-border arrangements to corporation tax, but makes it applicable to all taxes falling within the scope of Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, which include under Belgian law not only corporation tax, but also direct taxes.

principle of legality in criminal matters - general principle of legal certainty - right to respect for private life

Interpretation of Union law in the area of procedural guarantees for children in criminal proceedings with regard to the right to defense counsel and the obligations to provide information incumbent on the prosecuting authorities - Compatibility of provisions of national law with Union law - Right or obligation to disregard national provisions that are incompatible with directives - Possibility, right or duty to exclude evidence obtained in breach of provisions of directives in criminal proceedings - Duties of the public prosecutor in connection with effective judicial protection - Compatibility with Union law of provisions empowering the Minister for Justice to issue binding instructions to public prosecutors and to order the suspension of a judge from the performance of his duties - Art. 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.