Free movement of services — Interpretation of Directive 2000/31/EC ("e-commerce Directive") — Liability of intermediary service providers — Possibility of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement — Personal, material and territorial limits on the scope of an injunction — obligations to monitor

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Modification of the accusation in terms of classification of the act — No possibility to apply for a negotiated settlement after the trial proceedings had begun

Applicability of the ‘Tele2 Sverige/Watson requirements’ in the national security field

Having regard to Article 4 TEU and Article 1(3) of Directive 2002/58/EC4 on privacy and electronic communications (the “e-Privacy Directive”), does a requirement in a direction by a Secretary of State to a provider of an electronic communications network that it must provide bulk communications data to the Security and Intelligence Agencies (SIAs) of a Member State fall within the scope of Union law and of the e-Privacy Directive?

If the answer to Question (1) is “yes”, do any of the Watson Requirements, or any other requirements in addition to those imposed by the ECHR, apply to such a direction by a Secretary of State? And, if so, how and to what extent do those requirements apply, taking into account the essential necessity of the SIAs to …

Non-contractual liability - Instrument for pre-accession assistance - Third country - National public procurement - Devolved management - Decision of a national authority - Investigations by OLAF - Nonmaterial damage - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 - Principle of sound administration - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Right to be heard

References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/6/EC — Insider dealing — Penalties — National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts — Res judicata attached to a final criminal judgment relating to administrative proceedings — Final criminal judgment ordering acquittal in respect of insider dealing — Effectiveness of the penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Criminal nature of the administrative sanction — Existence of the same offence — Article 52(1) — Limitations to the ne bis in idem principle — Conditions

Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Declaration by a Member State allowing it to continue to apply earlier legal instruments — Withdrawal of the declaration by the executing State — Late declaration by the issuing State — Lack of direct effect of framework decisions — Primacy of EU law —

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Grounds for optional non-execution — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person sentenced to a custodial sentence in final proceedings conducted in his presence — Execution of sentence subsequently suspended in part subject to certain conditions — Subsequent proceedings leading to revocation of the suspension due to non-compliance with those conditions — Revocation proceedings conducted in the absence of the person concerned

Individual complaint to the General Court - Appeal — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of non-privileged applicants in direct actions — Concept of a lawyer — Autonomous concept of EU law — Opportunity to remedy a defect in legal representation

Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant — Offence underlying the imposition of a custodial sentence in the issuing Member State being punishable in the executing Member State by fine only

See also:

CJEU: Surrender of Resident if Executing State Unable to Enforce Custodial Sentence

Access to information of the detainee - Pre-trial detention - term of imprinsonment

Non-contractual liability — Investigation by OLAF — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Non-material damage — Causal link

Appeal is referred to as C-615/19 P.

Obligation of the Member States to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Flat-rate fine — Principle of proportionality — (No) direct applicability of the directive

The case is related to Case C-205/20 (ECJ, Grand Chamber judgment), in which the ECJ changed its approach on the direct applicability of obligations to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties

Definition of "the trial" in Article 4a of the Framework Decision - Extradition

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2014/41/EU — European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters — Article 5(1) — Form set out in Annex A — Section J — Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Surrender procedures between Member States - Conditions for execution - Grounds for optional non-execution - Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order - ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ - Legal proceedings amending or combining a sentence passed previously - Decision handing down a cumulative sentence - Decision handed down without the person concerned having appeared in person - Person convicted not having appeared in person at the trial in the context of his initial conviction, either at first instance or on appeal - Person represented by a legal counsellor in the appeal proceedings - Arrest warrant not providing any information in that regard - Consequences for the executing judicial authority

European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Reasons for optional non-execution — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person concerned having appeared in person at first instance — Appeal proceedings involving a re-examination of the substance of the case — Arrest warrant providing no information making it possible to check whether the rights of the defence of the person convicted were upheld during the appeal proceedings