CJEU cases
This CJEU case law documentation of eucrim monitors, collects, and summarises legal proceedings brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union in the field of European Union “criminastrive” law, with a focus on the protection of the Union’s financial interests. This database intends to give an overview of the various legal actions brought before the General Court and the Court of Justice, with a view to fostering a pan-European understanding and debate on the interpretation of the relevant EU law provisions, their incorporation into national legislation, and cooperation between judicial authorities. Users find (1) basic information on the case in the left column, such as the reference number, case name (“parties”), and referring court (if applicable), (2) a description of the subject matter in the central column, including related links to other eucrim content (e.g., summary of a CJEU decision in eucrim news), and (3) the state of play of the case in the right column. The database is regularly updated. Searches by keywords or the year of the case are also possible.
Case Information | Subject Matter | Stage of Proceedings |
---|---|---|
C-554/19
|
Schengen Borders Code - Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the Schengen area - Possibility of checks without regard to the conduct of the person concerned or the existence of special circumstances - National legal framework on the intensity, frequency and selectivity of checks. CategoriesSchengen Police Cooperation Procedural Safeguards |
Request Order |
C-510/19
|
Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States - autonomous interpretation of executing judicial authority in Art. 6(2) FD - Netherlands Openbaar Ministerie (Public Prosecution Service), more specifically the Officier van Justitie (Public Prosecutor), covered by the concept of judicial authority? - supplementary surrender according to Art. 27 FD - defendant’s right to be heard and right of access to the courts See also AG: Independence of Executing Judicial Authority Necessary to Decide on EAW Issues MoreCategoriesEuropean Arrest Warrant Judicial CooperationRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-508/19
|
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 2, Article 4(3), Article 6(3) and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 267 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Appointment to the position of Supreme Court judge by the President of the Republic on the proposal by the National Council of the Judiciary – Launch of the recruitment procedure without a ministerial countersignature – Judge appointed despite an action attacking the resolution of that council and a preliminary reference procedure – Request for a finding that there is no employment relationship between such a judge and the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) – Primacy of EU law CategoriesFundamental RightsRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-505/19
|
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 21 TFEU – Freedom of movement of persons – Interpol red notice – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data contained in such a notice MoreCategoriesJudicial Cooperation Ne bis in idemRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-489/19 PPU
|
Does the dependence of a public prosecutor's office on instructions prevent him from effectively issuing a European arrest warrant, even if that decision is subject to a full judicial review before the execution of the European arrest warrant? MoreCategoriesEuropean Arrest Warrant Judicial CooperationRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-488/19
|
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States - application to the situation where the requested person was convicted and sentenced in a third state but by virtue of a bilateral treaty between that third state and the issuing state, the judgment in the third state was recognised in the issuing state and enforced according to the laws of the issuing state - optional grounds for non-execution of EAW in Art. 4.1 and 4.7(b) FD EAW. CategoriesEuropean Arrest WarrantRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-487/19
|
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 2, Article 6(1) and (3) and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 267 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Court established by law – Principle of judicial independence – Appointment to the position of Supreme Court judge by the President of the Republic on the proposal by the National Council of the Judiciary – Judge appointed despite a pending legal action attacking the resolution of the National Council of the Judiciary proposing the appointment of the interested party and of a judicial decision ordering the suspension of that resolution MoreCategoriesFundamental RightsRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-481/19
|
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 14(3) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 30(1)(b) – Market abuse – Administrative sanctions of a criminal nature – Failure to cooperate with the competent authorities – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to remain silent and to avoid self-incrimination MoreCategoriesProcedural SafeguardsRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-467/19 PPU
|
Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings - negotiated penalty concluded between the prosecution and the defence - consistency with Article 7(4) of Directive 2016/343, with Article 47 and Article 52 of the Charter, and with the principles of effectiveness and equality MoreCategoriesFundamental Rights Procedural Safeguards |
Request Order |
C-439/19
|
General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679) - Art. 10 - processing of information relating to penalty points recorded against drivers for motoring offences CategoriesData Protection |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-398/19
|
Extradition of Union citizens to third countries - non-discrimination on grounds of nationality - Right of entry and residence - Union citizenship, but not at the time of arrest - follow-up to the Petruhhin judgment (C-182/15) CategoriesFundamental Rights Judicial CooperationRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
C-397/19
|
Commission Decision 2006/928/EC establishing a Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification (MCV) – Art. 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU ‑ Rule of law – Judicial independence – State liability – Civil liability of members of the judiciary for judicial error) MoreCategoriesFundamental RightsRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) |
C-393/19
|
Freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union - fundamental rights - right to property and right to effective remedy (Art. 17 and 47 CFR) - Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA - Directive 2014/42/EU - National legislation providing for the confiscation, for the benefit of the State – Property belonging to a third party acting in good faith MoreCategoriesFreezing of Assets / ConfiscationRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment |
T-386/19
|
Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Expenses considered undue – Recovery decision – Decision of the Court of Justice ruling on the breach of the obligations arising from the office of Member of the Court of Auditors – Lawfulness of OLAF’s investigation and final report – Duty to state reasons – Limitation period – Legitimate expectations – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability – Non-material damage CategoriesOLAF Protection of Financial InterestsRelated links |
Application Judgement Order |
C-379/19
|
Commission Decision 2006/928/EC establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification (MCV) – Legal effects of the MCV and of the reports established by the Commission on its basis – Criminal proceedings relating to corruption – Decisions of a constitutional court ruling on the exclusion of evidence obtained by or in collaboration with the intelligence services – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judicial independence – Primacy of EU law – Disciplinary proceedings against judges MoreCategoriesRule of Law Corruption |
Request Opinion (AG) |
C-357/19
|
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Criminal proceedings concerning corruption – Projects partially funded by European funds – Decision of a constitutional court ruling on the legality of the composition of judicial panels – National legislation providing for the composition of judicial panels by drawing lots – Extraordinary appeal against final judgments – Right to a tribunal previously established by law – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Primacy of EU law – Disciplinary proceedings against members of the judiciary MoreCategoriesProtection of Financial InterestsRelated links |
Request Opinion (AG) Judgment Order |